tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1513704378254120283.post1000298313189317604..comments2024-01-23T13:58:48.688-08:00Comments on The Trenches of Discovery: On its own, a Higgs discovery would be grim (II)Shaun Hotchkisshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04832423210563130467noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1513704378254120283.post-59482752577622026852012-07-04T02:06:40.568-07:002012-07-04T02:06:40.568-07:00Oops, thanks for that, John. The first top should ...Oops, thanks for that, John. The first top should have been an up. The charm and top quarks are replicas of the up quark (which is part of the proton and neutron).Shaun Hotchkisshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04832423210563130467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1513704378254120283.post-33722319467683366762012-07-04T01:01:33.681-07:002012-07-04T01:01:33.681-07:00Very interesting reading, Shaun. I must admit the ...Very interesting reading, Shaun. I must admit the bits about the various particles were a little (!!) beyond me, but with my proof reading hat on, is the statement "There is the top quark, but there is also the charm quark and top quark" correct? Or are there two top quarks?John Dennishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03731157060654330688noreply@blogger.com